
Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley appears by her choice to reject a ballot proposal to repeal the state’s 2011 casino law. (Image: AP Photo/Elise Amendola)
Opponents of casino gambling in Massachusetts have been war that is waging the expansion on every battlefront possible. They’ve had wins and losings across the continuing state, nonetheless they’ve always made their case. Now, they’re hoping that the court that is highest in Massachusetts gives them one last possiblity to place the issue before voters.
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court heard arguments last week over the question of whether a measure to repeal the 2011 casino law can show up on the statewide ballot in November. The move would essentially create a referendum on whether gambling enterprises could be built one which could disrupt the method also if it was to ultimately fail.
State Believes Implied Contracts Is Violated By Repeal
That disruption had been one for the main arguments made by attorneys for hawaii, including Attorney General Martha Coakley, whom rejected the petition because she felt it absolutely was unconstitutional. According to Coakley, such a repeal would cause damage to the ‚implied contracts‘ between casino license applicants and the state gambling commission. She argued that those contract rights would be illegally removed without any payment for the casino businesses.
Coakley made remarks at a morning meal forum „Massachusetts High Court Hears Case for Casino Repeal Vote“ weiterlesen