I will be somewhat upgrading and reposting this from 2012 due to the fact main-stream news have actually guaranteed really few individuals understand the detail associated with the “case” against Julian Assange in Sweden. The UN performing Group ruled that Assange ought not to have now been arrested in britain in the beginning while there is no situation, with no investigation that is genuine. Check this out and also you will understand why.
One other thing perhaps not commonly comprehended can there be isn’t any JURY in a rape test in Sweden and it’s also a SECRET TRIAL. Most of the proof, every one of the witnesses, are heard in secret. No public, no jury, no news. Really the only part that is public the charging and also the verdict. There was a judge and two advisers straight appointed by political events. And that means you never would get to comprehend just just just how clearly the situation is just a stitch-up. Unless you check this out.
You can find therefore numerous inconsistencies in Anna Ardin’s accusation of sexual attack against Julian Assange. Nevertheless the key question which leaps down at me – and which strangely We have maybe not seen asked any place else – is it:
Why did Anna Ardin perhaps perhaps not alert Sofia Wilen?
On 16 August, Julian Assange had intercourse with Sofia Wilen. Sofia had become understood into the Swedish team around Assange for the shocking red cashmere sweater she had used within the front row of Assange’s press conference. Anna Ardin knew Assange had been about to have intercourse with Sofia Wilen. On 17 August, Ardin texted a pal who had been interested in Assange:
“He’s maybe not right here. He’s planned to possess intercourse with all the cashmere woman every night, not managed to get. Perhaps he finally discovered time yesterday? ”
Yet Ardin later testified that simply three days earlier in the day, on 13 August, she have been intimately assaulted by Assange; an assault therefore serious she ended up being ready to decide to try (with great success) to ruin Julian Assange’s entire life. She has also been to convey that this attack involved enforced non-safe sex and she ended up being concerned with HIV.
If Ardin actually thought that on 13 August Assange had forced unsafe sex on her and also this might have transmitted HIV, why did she make no try to alert Sofia Wilen that Wilen was in risk of her life? And exactly why ended up being Ardin talking about with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and texting about any of it to buddies, without any disapproval that is evident discouragement?
Ardin had Wilen’s contact information and even had organised her enrollment for the press seminar. She may have warned her. But she didn’t.
Why don’t we fit that into a really brief survey regarding the entire Ardin/Assange relationship.
11 August: Assange comes in Stockholm for a press meeting organised by a branch regarding the Social Democratic Party. Anna Ardin has provided her one sleep flat for him in which to stay as she’s going to be away.
13 August: Ardin comes home early. She’s supper with Assange and they’ve got consensual sex, regarding the very first day’s conference. Ardin afterwards alleges this changed into attack by surreptitious mutilation for the condom.
14 August: Anna volunteers to do something as Julian’s press assistant. She sits close to him from the dais at their press seminar. Assange www.peekshows.cim fulfills Sofia Wilen here.
‘Julian desires to head to a crayfish party, anybody have a few available seats tonight or tomorrow? #fb’
This make an effort to look for a crayfish celebration fails, therefore Ardin organises one herself for him, in a yard outside her flat. Anna and Julian appear good together. One visitor hears Anna rib Assange that she thought “you had dumped me” as he got up from sleep early that early early morning. Another provides to Anna that Julian can keep her flat and come stick to them. She replies: “He can stick with me. ”
15 August Nevertheless during the crayfish party with Julian, Anna tweets:
‘Sitting outside at 02:00 and scarcely freezing aided by the world’s coolest smartest people, it is amazing! #fb’
Julian and Anna, based on both their authorities testimonies, rest once more in equivalent bed that is single and continue doing so for the following day or two. Assange tells police they continue to have intercourse; Anna tells police they cannot. That Anna and Julian go together to, and leave together from, a dinner with the leadership of the Pirate Party evening. They again sleep within the bed that is same.
16 August: Julian would go to have sexual intercourse with Sofia Wilen: Ardin will not alert her of prospective intimate assault. Another buddy provides Anna to take control housing Julian. Anna once again declines.
20 August: After Sofia Wilen contacts her to say this woman is focused on STD’s including HIV after unsafe sex with Julian, Anna takes her to see Anna’s buddy, other personal Democrat user, previous colleague for a passing fancy ballot in a council election, and campaigning feminist officer, Irmeli Krans. Ardin informs Wilen the authorities can compel Assange to simply simply take an HIV test. Ardin sits in throughout Wilen’s that is unrecorded breach of procedure – police meeting. Krans makes a declaration Assange that is accusing of. Wilen will not signal it.
21 August Having heard Wilen’s meeting and Krans’ statement from this, Ardin makes her own authorities declaration alleging Assange has surreptiously had sex that is unprotected her eight times formerly.
Some times later on: Ardin creates a broken condom into the authorities as proof; however a forensic assessment discovers no traces of Assange’s – or anyone else’s – DNA it is apparently unused on it, and indeed.
No witness has arrived ahead to express that Ardin complained of intimate attack by Assange before Wilen’s Ardin-arranged meeting with Krans – and Wilen arrived ahead to not whine of an attack, but check into STDs. Wilen refused to signal the declaration rape that is alleging that has been drafted by Ardin’s friend Krans in Ardin’s existence.
It is ordinary this one of a few things happened:
Either
Ardin had been intimately assaulted with non-safe sex, but did not alert Wilen whenever she knew Assange would definitely see her in hope of intercourse.
Ardin also proceeded to host Assange, assist him, come in general general general public and personal with him, behave as his press assistant, and rest in identical sleep with him, refusing repeated proposes to accommodate him elsewhere, all after he assaulted her.
Or
Ardin desired intercourse with Assange – from whatever motive. She “unexpectedly” came back home early after providing him the employment of her one sleep flat while she had been away. By her very own admission, she had sex that is consensual him, within hours of fulfilling him.
She discussed with Assange his desire for intercourse with Wilen, and appears at the least not to have been discouraging. Hearing of Wilen’s concern about HIV after non-safe sex, she took Wilen to her campaigning friend that is feminist policewoman Irmeli Krans, to be able to twist Wilen’s tale right into a sexual assault – quite easy provided Sweden’s astonishing “second-wave feminism” rape rules. Wilen declined to signal.
During the authorities section on 20 August, Wilen texted a pal at 14.25 “did not need to place any costs against JA nevertheless the authorities desired to get a handle on him. ”
At 17.26 she texted because I only wanted him to take a test” that she was “shocked when they arrested JA.
The evening that is next 22.22 she texted “it ended up being the authorities whom fabricated the charges”.
Ardin then composed her own tale of intimate attack. As a lot of buddies knew she ended up being making love with Assange, she could perhaps not claim non-consensual intercourse. Therefore she manufactured her tale to fit right in with Wilen’s issues by alleging the event regarding the torn condom. However the torn condom she produced doesn’t have trace of Assange upon it. It really is impractical to wear a condom rather than keep a DNA trace.
Summary
No difficulty is had by me in stating that We securely think Ardin to be always a liar. On her tale to be real involves acceptance of behavior which will be, within the sense that is literal amazing.
Ardin’s tale is needless to say extremely poor, but that doesn’t matter. Firstly, you had been never ever expected to see all this work detail. Rape studies in Sweden take place totally in key. There isn’t any jury, therefore the national federal federal federal government appointed judge is flanked by assessors appointed directly by governmental events. The trial will be secret, and the next thing you will hear is that he is guilty and a rapist if Assange goes to Sweden, he will disappear into jail.
Next, needless to say, it doesn’t matter the data is really poor, as in order to cry rape is always to tarnish a man’s reputation forever. Anna Ardin has succeeded in ruining a lot of the ongoing work and life of Assange. The facts for the tale being pathetic is unimportant.
By crying rape, politically correct opinion falls in behind the line it is incorrect also to consider the data. That she worked with CIA-funded anti-Castro groups in Havana and Miami if you are not allowed to know who the accuser is, how can you find out?
Finally, to those helpful idiots whom declare that the best way to test these things is in court, i might state needless to say, you might be appropriate, we must trust their state constantly, fit-ups never happen, therefore we should definitely condemn the disgraceful behavior of these whom campaigned when it comes to Birmingham Six.